Post Views:
3

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background to the Study

The
proliferation of small arms and light weapons is one of the major security
challenges currently facing Nigeria, Africa and indeed the world in general.
The trafficking and wide availability of these weapons fuel communal conflict,
political instability and pose a threat, not only to national security, but
also to sustainable development. The widespread proliferation of small arms is
contributing to alarming levels of armed crime, and militancy.

 The increasing pace of violence across the
globe, with major occurrence in Africa, has brought about renewed focus on
small and light weapons control. It is estimated that there is an approximate
of 875 million small arms in circulation across the globe, including those
stockpiled and in private procession, produced by over 1000 companies and
generating trade excess of US$8.5 billion (Karp, 2007). Out of this ominous
volume, governments and state militaries possess 200 million while 26 million
weapons are within the control of the law enforcement agencies. Similarly,
Chelule (2014) noted that there are about half a billion military small arms
around the world; each year between 300,000 to half a million people around the
world are killed by these weapons and every minute someone is killed by a gun;
90% of civilians are casualties by small arms because the civilians get access
to purchase more than 80% of the arms produced in the world. To establish the
extent of this threat in Africa, Bah (2004) asserts that out of an approximate
of 500 million illicit weapons in circulation worldwide, an estimate of 100
million are in Sub-Saharan Africa with eight to ten million concentrated in the
West African sub-region alone. This portentoustrend
further reveals that Africa needs strategic intervention.

Small arms proliferation has been particularly devastating in
Africa where machine guns, rifles, grenades, pistols and other small arms have
killed and displaced many civilians across the continent (Allison, 2006). The
result of this rapid expansion of weapons according to Allison (2006) is that
the weapons, their parts and ammunition are more easily diverted from their
intended destination. Consequently, countries with fewer and less strict gun
regulations become the destination points. War-torn or post-conflict nations
which are common in Africa portend a profitable market for the sale of Small
Arms and Light Weapons (SALW). The guns have thus far fostered instability in
the West African region, worsened the security of the region, weakened the
power of the government and provided a motivation for poverty to thrive.

At the national level, Nigeria continues to rely onthe National
Firearms Act of 1959 as the legal instrument governing small arms possession,
manufacture and the use in the country as amended even though the Robbery and
Firearms (Special Provisions) Decree No.5 was promulgated in 1984 and later the
Robbery and Firearms (Special Provisions) Act. In July 2000, the Nigerian
government proposed and established a National Committee on the Proliferation
and Illicit Trafficking in Small Arms and Light Weapons the purpose of which
was to determine the sourcing illegal small arms and collect information on
small arms proliferation in Nigeria. In May 2001, the government established a
second committee aimed at implementing the 1998 ECOWAS Moratorium. These two
committees were later merged into a single committee. The committee has
accomplished little due to lack of political will, financial support, technical
expertise, and institutional capacity. Consequently, there were renewed efforts
in 2007 to revive the activities of the Committee and legislation is being
written to convert the Committee into a national commission. It requested
support from the ECOWAS Small Arms Programme to conduct the survey and to undertake
other activities in support of the implementation of the 2006 ECOWAS Convention
(Hazenand Horner, 2007). Inaugurated in 2001, the NATCOM is responsible for the
registration and control of SALW, and granting of permits for exemptionsunder
the ECOWAS Moratorium (Chuma-Okoro, 2011).

Despite these national-efforts, the rate of accumulation ofSALW is
increasing and becoming endemic as various forms of violence and casualties are
in the recent times recorded in the country. There is lack of capacity and
strong legal or effective institutional frameworks to regulate SALW and combat
the phenomenon of SALW proliferation in Nigeria, particularly Northern part of
Nigeria (Chuma-Okoro, 2011). More fundamentally, the Nigeria is yet to deal
with the demand factors of SALW proliferation preferring to dwell on the
symptoms rather than the root causes. The demand factors are the root causes of
SALW proliferation, because if there is no demand, there will not be supply. Consequently,
Nigeria now features prominently in the three-spot cline of transnational
organised trafficking of SALWs in West Africa: origin, transit route and
destination. Weapons in circulation in Nigeria come from local fabrication,
residue of guns used during the civil war, thefts from government armouries,
smuggling, dishonest government-accredited importers, ethnic militias,
insurgents from neighbouring countries and some multinational oilcorporations
operating in the oil-rich but crisis-plagued Niger Delta. Whenand where these
SALWs are deployed, human security has been the main victim.

These were the motivations
for the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Convention of Small
arms and Light Weapons in 2006. The highlights of the Convention include the a ban on international
small arms transfers (except those for legitimate self-defence and security
needs, or for peace support operations); a ban on transfers of small arms to
non-state actors that are not authorized by the importing member state;
procedures for shared information; stringent regulatory scheme for anyone
wishing to possess small arms and strong management standards to ensure the
security of weapons stockpiles.

It is in consonance with the highlight of the 2006 SALW Convention
and other subsequent attempt of ECOWAS to tackle the issues of gun control that
this study attempts to examine the challenges of ECOWAS in combating Small and
Light Arms in Africa.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

The dimensions and persistence of conflicts in West Africa has
created a favourable outlet for the sale of arms and other light weapons.
Chiekh (2005) noted that these conflicts
have had the combined effect of sucking in millions of illicit small arms, making
the Mano River Basin (comprising Guinea, Sierra Leone, Liberia and, by
extension, Côte d’Ivoire) an attractive and profitable theatre for illicit arms
merchants, mercenaries and other non-state actors. These unstable conditions make it difficult to
regulate arms sales and movements. More so, the dealings in Small Arms and
Light Weapons (SALWs) have been a source of income for countries who are
engaged in the production of guns. Apart from the direct sales of guns and
light weapons, weapons are traded with West Africans for natural resources such
as rubber, timber and, most importantly, diamonds
(Chiekh, 2005). This barter system has made the running of SALW beneficial to
both parties.

In West Africa, the uneven implementation of
regional agreements leaves loopholes that arms traffickers can utilize for
their nefarious trade. These traffickers are usually quick to adopt trade
routes where national controls are weak, and often take advantage of
insufficient cooperation between border control authorities or differences in
national regulation. These trends have necessitated the quest for a framework
for the implementation of the ECOWAS convention and the need for a broad based
inter-sectoral platform and collaboration between government and agencies, and
local communities.So far, the ECOWAS convention is still undergoing
harmonization with local arms law in the various national parliaments of member
states.

About 350 million of the 500 million Small
Arms and Light Weapons (SALWs) in West Africa are in Nigeria. This is a
whopping 70 per cent of the West African sub-region’s SALWs, 90 per cent of
which are in the hands of non-state actors. Yet the situation only promises to
grow worse with the influx of weapons from the residue of the conflicts in
Libya and Mali (This Day, 2016). What this has revealed clearly is that there
is a growing market for SALWs in the country and government ought to intervene
more decisively to stem the ugly tide. The insurgency in the North-East, the
resurgence of militancy in the Niger Delta, the menace of herdsmen in the
North-Central and the rising wave of violent crimes, including armed robbery
and kidnappings, particularly in the South-East and the South-West of the
country are directly linked to the upsurge in SALWs even as they demonstrate
the concrete negative impact on national efforts at integration and
development.

To deal with these challenges, government
needs to key into the ECOWAS Convention on Small Arms and Light Weapons. In
light of this, it is pertinent to note that while Nigeria is a signatory to the
ECOWAS protocols, the National Assembly is yet to pass the bill concerning the
establishment of the National Commission against the Proliferation of Small
Arms and Light Weapons. Indeed, Nigeria is the only West African country that
does not have the commission that is saddled with the responsibility of
tracking the spread of SALWs. In like manner, the archaic 1959 Firearms Act
that regulates the use of firearms in the country is yet to be amended by the
federal legislature.

These challenges as it applies to states in
West Africa have not only hampered the economic development of the individual
states but that of the region also, putting both lives and property in danger. The proliferation of these small arms and the
new emergent trend in violence in the region put to question the efficacy and general
commitment of ECOWAS to combating this menace (Bashir, 2014). The research is therefore an attempt to
critically evaluate the challenges and prospects of ECOWAS in combating small
and light arms proliferation in the region vis-à-vis the effects of small and
light weapon proliferation in West Africa.

1.3 Objective of the Study

The main objective of the study is to investigate the efforts and
challenges of ECOWAS in its bid to control the proliferation of Small and Light
Arms in the West African region. The specific objectives are to:

1. trace the flow and distribution of small and
   light arms in West Africa;
2. assess the instruments used by Ecowas in
   combating Small and Light Arms in the West Africa;

1. examine Ecowas border control
   methodologies and its protocol on free movement of people and goods in
   light of the proliferation of small and light arms in West Africa;
2. ascertain the extent to which Nigeria has
   implemented theEcowas Convention on Small Arms and Light Weapons and
3. probe the effects of domestic laws on the
   general objectives of Ecowas Small Arms Control Programme vis-à-vis the extent
   to which the Nigerian Fire Arms law has curbed the proliferation of small
   and light arms in Nigeria.

1.4 Research Questions

The following research questions would be
addressed in the course of the research, serving as a guideline to the
attainment of the research objectives:

Related